"Peace be both to thee, and peace be to thine house, and peace be unto all that thou hast."
—1 Samuel 25:6
"And Allāh had made your homes a place of rest for you."
—Qur'ān 16:80
"Our age is seen as the most homeless of all."[[1]]
—Maurice Friedman
"Uprootedness is by far the most dangerous malady to which human societies are exposed."[[2]]
—Simone Weil
Throughout the modern world, we come across deeply disturbing images of millions of unhoused people in every major city. We see tents lined up along concrete sidewalks against towering soulless buildings, bodies lying on flimsy pieces of cardboard ruthlessly exposed to the elements, with some encampments extending up to fifty city blocks. We observe involuntary migration or displacement on a staggering scale, as a result of regional conflict, violence, genocide, or natural disasters. In many ways, we have become anesthetized to seeing such images and hearing about the devastating plight, if not sheer dehumanization, of people in these circumstances. What are we to make of this dire situation, and what are its implications for humanity?
In this essay we revisit what it means to have a “home” to gain insight into the growing epidemic of homelessness. Home is more than just a physical dwelling. For many spiritual traditions, it is an extension of our places of worship—sacred abodes for prayer and contemplation. In our itinerant world, staying in motels, shelters, makeshift encampments, or automobiles or on couches for long durations has forced us to rethink conventional notions of home: yet another sign of our present-day uprootedness, which is inseparable from the spiritual crisis that plagues the modern world.
…if we do not grasp the spiritual roots of the problem, it can never be solved.
Physical homelessness is both a symbol and an effect of the spiritual homelessness from which the postmodern world is suffering. This is not to minimize the grave nature of physical homelessness that is so prevalent today. But if we do not grasp the spiritual roots of the problem, it can never be solved. The loss of a sense of the sacred has unleashed a pernicious nihilism, accompanied by a corresponding degradation of dignity resulting from a spiritual abyss that can never be filled by the profane world. This disorder has inflicted an unhealable wound on the contemporary psyche.
A key element of our collective psyche today is the phenomenon of alienation and its corollary, displacement, both literally and in terms of our isolated identities. Mental health professionals attempt to assess, diagnose, and treat illnesses of the mind without acknowledging the suffering caused by the ubiquitous secularism of our desacralized world. Without understanding the historical developments that led to the rise of modernity—the Renaissance, along with the Scientific Revolution that gave rise to the Age of Enlightenment—it is difficult to understand how this trajectory radically undermined traditional notions of a healthy and integrated self. Mental health treatments in our day are still based on the fragmented and scientistic foundations of the Enlightenment project, and thus they fail to address—at their root—the multifarious calamities facing humanity during our current age of acute existential crisis.
Chronic homelessness is, arguably, the result of the social experiment of deinstitutionalization. The removal of people with severe mental illness from asylums and the closing down of many mental hospitals (which began in 1955) is known as deinstitutionalization. The paradox of this policy is that many of the mentally ill, who had been confined—against their will—in wretched conditions were later sent to prisons. The incarceration statistics clearly show the over-representation of such individuals in the penitentiary system. The transition of mental health treatment from psychiatric hospitals to community-based centers has been disastrous owing to poor infrastructure and inadequate funding. While deinstitutionalization appeared to be liberating people from the unjust practice of inhumane confinement, it effectively abandoned the mentally ill to a dismal and uncertain future.
Spirituality—as informed by the world’s religions—must be seriously considered as a means of recovery from mental health problems, such as trauma, alcoholism, and substance abuse, and it can serve as a protective factor against the adversities experienced with homelessness.[[3]]
Prior to modernism, the world’s traditional cultures viewed human beings as both geomorphic (of the earth) and theomorphic (of the Spirit). There is a transcendent and immanent reality that connects us to the whole of existence. Sacred psychology is able to discern the tripartite constitution of human beings and that of the cosmos—of which we are but a mirror—consisting of Spirit, soul, and body; or the spiritual, psychic, and corporeal states. In the same way that the human heart is a habitation for the Divine presence, the physical home is a mirror of our metaphysical home. This is to say that human beings have both a temporal residence in this world and an eternal abode. There is a powerful connection between the created order and the Divine. It is worth recalling that the word ecology derives from the Greek word oikos (meaning “home” or “dwelling”).[[4]] The ecological ethic requires us to appreciate our home. It entails stewardship and tending, based on our interconnectedness and concomitant responsibilities towards creation as a whole. Our true home, in other words, is the Sacred.
A metaphysical outlook distinguishes a horizontal from a vertical dimension of both our identity and the whole of reality. Horizontal homelessness is a displacement from our humanity, from our rootedness in geography and community, while vertical homelessness is a displacement of the soul from the Spirit. Without a sense of the sacred roots of existence, we find ourselves in a decentered cosmos, adrift in a sea of not only spiritual disorientation but actual homelessness. Having lost connection with the Transcendent, we become disconnected from our ontological foundations, with an unsettling malaise, without necessarily being aware of its true cause.
It is by blinding ourselves to our sacred place in the cosmos that we become spiritually homeless. In a very general sense, the following events of our modern intellectual history have led to our spiritual sense of homelessness.
The first is the cosmological blow, more commonly known as the “Copernican revolution” attributed to Nicolaus Copernicus (1473–1543), which unmoored the human being from traditional understandings of reality, from his traditional Center: in particular, from a conception of the person as a microcosm; as the Sufi adage says, “Man is a little cosmos, and the cosmos is like a big man.”[[5]] Historian of science Alexandre Koyré (1892–1964) regarded this event as the “scientific and philosophical…destruction of the Cosmos.”[[6]]
The second is the biological blow, or what has been dubbed the “Darwinian revolution” attributed to Charles Darwin (1809–1882), which reduced humanity to mere animality. It cut Man off from his traditional Origin: as Imago Dei. The following statement situates the theoretical ground from which behavioristic psychology, not unlike psychoanalysis, was able to solidify the worldview of modernity: “Darwin challenged a practice of segregation in which man set himself firmly apart from the animals, and the bitter struggle which arose is not yet ended. But … Darwin put man in his biological place…”[[7]]
The third is the psychological blow—the “psychoanalytic revolution” attributed to Sigmund Freud (1856–1939), who attacked pre-modern modes of knowing. He undermined the traditional distinction between reason (ratio) and the Intellect (Intellectus), thus proclaiming that human beings are governed by unconscious or instinctual forces that exist beyond the normal reaches of our awareness. This cut Man off from the Logos. Freud writes: “Man’s intellect is powerless in comparison with his instinctual life.”[[8]] This subverts the notion of the Intellect or “eye of the heart” as a transcendent faculty that directly apprehends that “the Ego is not master in its own house.”[[9]] This served to further undermine the metaphysical symbolism of our kinship with the cosmos.
Cut off reductively from Transcendence, the sensory domain becomes one-dimensional, without substance, and disorienting. American philosopher E.A. Burtt (1892–1989) describes the problem:
The world that people had thought themselves living in—a world rich with colour and sound, redolent with fragrance, filled with gladness, love and beauty, speaking everywhere of purposive harmony and creative ideals—was crowded now into minute corners in the brains of scattered organic beings. The really important world outside was a world hard, cold, colourless, silent, and dead.[[10]]
“To be rooted is perhaps the most important and least recognized need of the human soul.”
(Simone Weil)
In the traditional view, Man is both of the earth and the Spirit. This interconnection complements and harmonizes our sense of unity within ourselves and with each other, and with the created order. It is vital for us to have an awareness of spiritual rootedness. Simone Weil (1909–1943) addresses the need for the person to have roots:
A human being has roots by virtue of his real, active and natural participation in the life of a community…. This participation is a natural one, in the sense that it is automatically brought about by place, conditions of birth, profession and social surroundings. Every human being needs to have multiple roots. It is necessary for him to draw wellnigh the whole of his moral, intellectual and spiritual life by way of the environment of which he forms a natural part.[[11]]
She adds, “To be rooted is perhaps the most important and least recognized need of the human soul.”[[12]] Swiss physician Paul Tournier (1898–1986) referred to the pathology of this condition as being “spiritually uprooted.”[[13]] Homelessness on the physical plane is a manifestation of what one might call “transcendental homelessness.”[[14]]

Traditionally, human beings felt at home in the cosmos, yet intuitively they knew that their ultimate abode was in the Spiritual Realm. The home is a microcosm of the macrocosm. Mircea Eliade (1907–1986), the Romanian historian of religion, writes: “The house is an imago mundi [image of the world].”[[15]] Across all spiritual traditions, René Guénon (1886–1951) observes that “The house was ... an image of the Cosmos, that is, a ‘little world’, closed and complete in itself.”[[16]] Frithjof Schuon (1907–1998) also speaks to the metaphysical significance of our true abode, noting that it is known by the First Peoples, for example, as the “primordial Home that everywhere manifests the Great Spirit.”[[17]] Within the final revelation of this temporal cycle, the Islamic tradition views the home as an extension of the place of worship. The longing for the Absolute, as Seyyed Hossein Nasr explains, is what allows us to connect our terrestrial with our spiritual home: “It is through reminiscence of his original abode that man begins to have a nostalgia for his veritable home, and with the help of illuminative knowledge he is able to reach that abode.”[[18]]
The view of modernity differs radically from this realization; for example, Le Corbusier (Charles-Édouard Jeanneret, 1887–1965) famously remarked that “A house is a machine for living in.”[[19]] Art historian and metaphysician Ananda Coomaraswamy (1877–1947) made the following observation about the rift between the modern and the traditional perspectives: “Those who think of their house as only a ‘machine to live in’ should judge their point of view by that of Neolithic man, who also lived in a house, but a house that embodied a cosmology.”[[20]]
By divesting a home of its sacred cosmology, we become rendered estranged from ourselves, others, and the natural world. American cultural historian William Barrett (1913–1992) has noted that “the worst and final form of alienation … is man’s alienation from his own self.”[[21]] He discusses the connection between the collective state of estrangement and the rise of homelessness:
[M]an’s feeling of homelessness, of alienation has been intensified in the midst of a bureaucratized, impersonal mass society. He has come to feel himself an outsider even within his own human society. He is trebly alienated: a stranger to God, to nature, and to the gigantic social apparatus that supplies his material wants.[[22]]
We recall here the wisdom of the following African proverb: “When a nation is about to come to ruin, the cause begins in the homes”[[23]] of its people. As the broader culture begins to weaken, it inevitably affects life in the home, and the degradation of home life undermines the whole of society. Simone Weil has remarked on the profound cultural implications of rootlessness: “Amidst all the present forms of the uprooting malady, the uprooting of culture is not the least alarming … relations being cut, each thing is looked upon as an end in itself.”[[24]]
In such a state of spiritual disorientation, even if we seek security everywhere in the horizontal domain, we will never find it, and are doomed to restlessness. It is in the vertical dimension alone that we can find our true sanctuary and refuge.
Spiritual poverty is not a deprivation, but a profound submission to the Divine: “Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 5:3); and likewise, “I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me” (Matthew 25:35). The goal of the spiritual traditions was never to establish a utopia on earth, for Christ said: “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36). It is not that the unhoused are without faith or belief in the Divine; rather, they are facing the consequences of what happens when humanity becomes uprooted. It is a corrosive condition that gradually subverts and, as we are noting, overwhelms humanity.
Notions of homelessness existed within all the world’s faith traditions, yet they represented a form of detachment from worldliness, entailing sacrifice and asceticism whereby life is devoted to the sacred. For example, there is the practice of renouncing possessions and abandoning all social ties known as “entering into homelessness” (Sanskrit: pravrajyā; Pāli: pabbajjā). There is also the “homeless one” (Sanskrit/Pāli: anagārika), which is contrasted with the “householder” (Japanese: zaike) or a person who lives as a layperson within a spiritual tradition. However, the vocation of a monk was only meant for those who were especially qualified to follow an austere life devoted to such a calling; it was never meant for the common person. Then again, there are those within other spiritual traditions who practice similar austerities; for example, the Christian tradition has the “Fools for Christ” and, in Islam, there are the Malāmatiyya (“those who invite reproach”), along with the Avadhūta (“those who have shaken off the world”) in the Hindu tradition.
Owing to the stigma associated with “homelessness,” the terminology has recently changed to “unhoused.” Being homeless implies that a person does not have a physical residence, which suggests personal failure, whereas “unhoused” highlights a structural issue about the shortcomings of society at large. Whatever words are used, this problem remains complex and intractable without a spiritually-rooted solution.
In a broader historical context, what does it mean when a people’s territory has been confiscated in an attempt to displace them, if not eradicate them—how do we understand this notion of homelessness when, prior to this theft, aboriginal communities were rooted in their traditional lands since time immemorial? While there were always exceptions, such as we find with nomadic peoples, home is recognized as a place of permanence even though the location may be constantly shifting. As the Japanese poet Matsuo Bashō (1644–1694) writes: “[E]very day is a journey, and the journey itself is home.”[[25]] To be sure, nomads experience stability by being anchored in the sacred conditions of their natural surroundings, and thus do not consider themselves homeless. Indeed, the nomadic way of life abides in “a state of remembrance” concerning one’s true domicile, which is located beyond the temporal order, even while fully immersed in it. However, urban life with its fixed sedentary structures, when devoid of sacred tradition, can make it easier to forget our celestial origins.
For the ancients—continuing up to the traditional peoples of the present day—home is understood as having both a transcendent and immanent aspect. This is conveyed in the Hermetic maxim “God is an infinite sphere whose center is everywhere, whose circumference is nowhere.”[[26]] At the core of a human being lies the indwelling Spirit. Because our spiritual homeland can be found within us, wherever we find ourselves and under whatever conditions we may exist, our Center abiding in this reality is always accessible. This is illuminated here: “The kingdom of God is within you” (Luke 17:21),“I am the Self … seated in the heart of all beings”[[27]] (Bhagavad Gītā 10:20), or “Heaven and earth cannot contain Me, but the heart of My faithful servant containeth Me” (hadīth qudsī). Thus, the human vocation lies in finding our way back from the periphery of phenomenal life to the abiding reality at the heart of all things.
We are witness today to the widespread dissolution of all traditional structures. Homelessness is a societal cancer as it spreads its dystopic tentacles throughout the world. Whatever we may think of people struggling to cope with this situation, we cannot make this epidemic invisible or turn a blind eye to it. What is missing from a worldly understanding of this phenomenon is that one of the manifestations of ontological alienation is indeed physical homelessness. A profound severance from ourselves, each other, and the cosmos has caused a tumultuous disorientation. When we fail to be socially integrated, we collapse into disorder. The homelessness crisis is not solely the problem of the person experiencing this affliction, but reflects, at a deeper level, the tragic fracturing of our culture and our link to a sacred web that connects us all.
To understand this, we need to realize that our true “home” is much more than having four walls, a foundation, and a roof over our heads. It is the same sky that we share as a canopy. It is the same Sun that sustains us. To restore what has been lost, we need to be aware of the spiritual crisis in our midst and its broader ramifications for humanity. In as much as we are living our lives in a world that chooses to degrade the Sacred, we are inevitably suffering the consequences of being homeless in a quintessential sense. To be human is to be called to the Transcendent, and the soul cannot rest until it returns to its abiding home in the Spirit, a journey that must be supported through our adherence to one of humanity’s divinely revealed sapiential traditions. This is why, time and time again, we continually hear the following call in the midst of our forgetfulness: “Return to your original home!”[[28]]
Bibliography
Ashanti Proverbs. Translated by Robert Sutherland Rattray. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1916.
Barrett, William. Irrational Man: A Study in Existential Philosophy. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1962.
Bashō, Matsuo. Narrow Road to the Interior and Other Writings. Translated by Sam Hamill. Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications, 2000.
Bendeck Sotillos, Samuel.“Addiction and the Quest for Wholeness.” Spirituality Studies 8, no. 1 (Spring 2022): 28–41.
Bendeck Sotillos, Samuel. “The Eclipse of the Soul and the Rise of the Ecological Crisis.” Spirituality Studies 8, no. 2 (Fall 2022): 34–55.
Bendeck Sotillos, Samuel. “The Metaphysics of Trauma.” Transcendent Philosophy: An International Journal for Comparative Philosophy and Mysticism 23 (December 2022): 23–53.
Bendeck Sotillos, Samuel.“Suicide: A Spiritual Perspective.” Transcendent Philosophy: An International Journal for Comparative Philosophy and Mysticism 24 (December 2023): 71–103.
The Bhagavad-Gītā with the Commentary of Śrī Śankarachāryā. Translated by Alladi Mahadeva Sastri. Madras: V. Ramaswamy Sastrulu & Sons, 1961.
Burtt, E. A. The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Science. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 2003.
Chittick, William C., ed. The Essential Seyyed Hossein Nasr. Bloomington, IN: World Wisdom, 2007.
Chittick, William C. The Sufi Path of Love: The Spiritual Teachings of Rumi. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1983.
Coomaraswamy, Ananda K. Christian and Oriental Philosophy of Art. New York: Dover Publications, 1956.
Copenhaver, Brian P.Hermetica: The Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the Latin Asclepius in a New English Translation with Notes and Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. Translated by Willard R. Trask. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1987.
Freud, Sigmund. The Future of an Illusion. Translated and edited by James Strachey. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1989.
Freud, Sigmund. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 17. Translated and edited by James Strachey. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1955.
Friedman, Maurice. Introduction to Between Man and Man, by Martin Buber, xix–xx. New York: Macmillan Company, 1965.
Guénon, René. Symbols of Sacred Science. Translated by Henry D. Fohr, edited by Samuel D. Fohr. Hillsdale, NY: Sophia Perennis, 2004.
The Holy Bible, King James Version. Philadelphia, PA: National Bible Press, 1944.
Ibn ‘Arabī. The Wisdom of the Prophets (Fusus al-Hikam). Translated by Titus Burckhardt and Angela Culme-Seymour. Gloucestershire, UK: Beshara, 1975.
Koyré, Alexandre. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.
Le Corbusier. Towards a New Architecture. Translated by Frederick Etchells. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 1986.
Lukács, Georg. The Theory of the Novel: A Historico-philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature. Translated by Anna Bostock. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1977.
Schuon, Frithjof. The Feathered Sun: Plains Indians in Art and Philosophy. Bloomington, IN: World Wisdom Books, 1990.
Skinner, B. F. Science and Human Behavior. New York: Free Press, 1965.
Study Quran, The: A New Translation and Commentary. Edited by Seyyed Hossein Nasr, Caner K. Dagli, Maria Massi Dakake, Joseph E. B. Lumbard, and Mohammed Rustom. New York: HarperOne, 2015.
Tournier, Paul. Escape from Loneliness. Translated by John S. Gilmour. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1962.
Weil, Simone. The Need for Roots. Translated by Arthur Wills. London: Routledge, 2007.

Samuel Bendeck Sotillos is a practicing psychotherapist who has worked for years in the field of mental health and social services. His focus is on comparative religion and the intersection between culture, spirituality, and psychology. His works include Paths That Lead to the Same Summit: An Annotated Guide to World Spirituality, Dismantling Freud: Fake Therapy and the Psychoanalytic Worldview (previously published as Psychology Without Spirit: The Freudian Quandary), and Behaviorism: The Quandary of a Psychology without a Soul. He edited the issue on ‘Psychology and the Perennial Philosophy’ for Studies in Comparative Religion, and his articles have appeared in numerous journals and magazines including Sacred Web, Sophia, Parabola, Resurgence, and the Temenos Academy Review. He lives on the Central Coast of California.
[[1]]: Maurice Friedman, “Introduction,” to Martin Buber, Between Man and Man (New York, NY: Macmillan Company, 1965), pp. xix–xx.
[[2]]: Simone Weil, “Uprootedness,” inThe Need for Roots, trans. Arthur Wills (London, UK: Routledge, 2007), p. 47.
[[3]]: See Samuel Bendeck Sotillos, “The Metaphysics of Trauma,” Transcendent Philosophy: An International Journal for Comparative Philosophy and Mysticism, Vol. 23 (December 2022), pp. 23–53; Samuel Bendeck Sotillos, “Addiction and the Quest for Wholeness,” Spirituality Studies, Vol. 8, No. 1 (Spring 2022), pp. 28–41; Samuel Bendeck Sotillos, “Suicide: A Spiritual Perspective,” Transcendent Philosophy: An International Journal for Comparative Philosophy and Mysticism, Vol. 24 (December 2023), pp. 71–103.
[[4]]: Samuel Bendeck Sotillos,“The Eclipse of the Soul and the Rise of the Ecological Crisis,” Spirituality Studies, Vol. 8, No. 2 (Fall 2022), pp.34–55.
[[5]]: Sufi adage, quoted in Ibn ‘Arabī, The Wisdom of the Prophets (Fusus al-Hikam), trans. Titus Burckhardt and Angela Culme-Seymour (Gloucestershire, UK: Beshara Publications, 1975), p. 11.
[[6]]: Alexandre Koyré, “Introduction,” to From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979), p. 2.
[[7]]: B.F. Skinner, “Can Science Help?,” in Science and Human Behavior (New York, NY: Free Press, 1965), p. 7.
[[8]]: Sigmund Freud, “Chapter 10,” in The Future of an Illusion, trans. and ed. James Strachey (New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, 1989), p. 68.
[[9]]: Sigmund Freud, “A Difficulty in the Path of Psycho-Analysis” (1917), in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 17, trans. and ed. James Strachey (London, UK: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1955), p. 143.
[[10]]: E.A. Burtt, “The Metaphysics of Newton,” in The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Science (Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 2003), pp. 238–239.
[[11]]: Simone Weil, “Uprootedness,” in The Need for Roots, trans. Arthur Wills (London, UK: Routledge, 2007), p. 43.
[[12]]: Simone Weil, “Uprootedness,” in The Need for Roots, trans. Arthur Wills (London, UK: Routledge, 2007), p. 43.
[[13]]: Paul Tournier, “Loneliness,” in Escape from Loneliness, trans. John S. Gilmour (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1962), p. 25.
[[14]]: Georg Lukács, “The Epic and the Novel,” in The Theory of the Novel: A Historico-philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature, trans. Anna Bostock (Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1977), p. 61.
[[15]]: Mircea Eliade, “Sacred Space and Making the World Sacred,” in The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion, trans. Willard R. Trask (New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1987), p. 53.
[[16]]: René Guénon, “Frameworks and Labyrinths,” in Symbols of Sacred Science, trans. Henry D. Fohr, ed. Samuel D. Fohr (Hillsdale, NY: Sophia Perennis, 2004), p. 385.
[[17]]: Frithjof Schuon, “Excerpts from Correspondence,” in The Feathered Sun: Plains Indians in Art and Philosophy (Bloomington, IN: World Wisdom Books, 1990), p. 158.
[[18]]: Seyyed Hossein Nasr, “Suhrawardī,” in The Essential Seyyed Hossein Nasr, ed. William C. Chittick (Bloomington, IN: World Wisdom, 2007), p. 114.
[[19]]: Le Corbusier, “Eyes Which Do Not See,” in Towards a New Architecture, trans. Frederick Etchells (Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 1986), p. 95.
[[20]]: Ananda K. Coomaraswamy, “The Christian and Oriental, or True, Philosophy of Art,” in Christian and Oriental Philosophy of Art (New York, NY: Dover Publications, 1956), p. 32.
[[21]]: William Barrett, “The Encounter with Nothingness,” in Irrational Man: A Study in Existential Philosophy (Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1962), p. 36.
[[22]]: William Barrett, “The Encounter with Nothingness,” in Irrational Man: A Study in Existential Philosophy (Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1962), pp. 35–36.
[[23]]: Quoted in Ashanti Proverbs, trans. Robert Sutherland Rattray (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1916), p. 125.
[[24]]: Simone Weil, “Uprootedness,” in The Need for Roots, trans. Arthur Wills (London, UK: Routledge, 2007), p. 68.
[[25]]: Matsuo Bashō, Narrow Road to the Interior and Other Writings, trans. Sam Hamill (Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications, 2000), p. 4.
[[26]]: Hermes Trismegistus, quoted in Brian P. Copenhaver, Hermetica: The Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the Latin Asclepius in a New English Translation with Notes and Introduction (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. xlvii.
[[27]]: Bhagavad Gītā 10:20, The Bhagavad-Gītā with the Commentary of Śrī Śankarachāryā, trans. Alladi Mahadeva Sastri (Madras: V. Ramaswamy Sastrulu & Sons, 1961), p. 241.
[[28]]: Rūmī, quoted in William C. Chittick, The Sufi Path of Love: The Spiritual Teachings of Rumi (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1983), p. 357.